Comments on: “Think of your own —— names you lazy dastards!”

By: jim m.

jim m. — Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0000

We Like Short Shorts!

I hope the ravenous appetite for 80’s nostalgia has preserved that reference enough to make the name stick.

By: SpaceGhost2K

SpaceGhost2K — Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0000

I like Tic-Tac-Toons. Thought I’d share that.

By: SpaceGhost2K

SpaceGhost2K — Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0000

I like Tic-Tac-Toons. Thought I’d share that.

By: Eric San Gregorio

Eric San Gregorio — Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0000

Not sure if my thoughts will help, but the post about keeping or losing the ‘tradition’ of using “cartoon” in the title made the gears crank just a bit, so here goes.

To be honest, I truly hope that CG creators or creators using other animation forms still think of their creations in terms of “cartoons.”

However, if you did want to remove the word “cartoon” from the title you could always take a page from the 1950s and use a name with some fun word play like “Astonishing Atomation” or “Atomatics” and then for the fun of it throw in a secondary title like “Atomic Entertainment for the New Millennium” or just “Atomic Powered Entertainment.”

Honestly, wasn’t it fun when we knew nothing about real science and everything had atomic dinosaurs, and atomic rocket cars. (~_^)

Anyhow, those are my two cents. (Although I my be highballing that value a bit.) I hope it helps.

By: Fred Seibert

Fred Seibert — Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0000

Actually, I’m finding all of the various “cartoon” naming discussions incredibly helpful. Thanks Eric, and everyone else too.