Comments on: Da Best of Dafoe http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/refrederator/2006/09/12/da-best-of-dafoe/ Sat, 26 May 2012 03:06:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: 2oonhed http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/refrederator/2006/09/12/da-best-of-dafoe/#comment-389 2oonhed Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000 http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/refrederator/2006/09/12/da-best-of-dafoe/#comment-389 1st title was a "Commonwealth Pictures Presents". no copyright date.<br />2nd title The Van Beuren Corp,<br />copyright MCMXXXV (1935) 1st title was a “Commonwealth Pictures Presents”. no copyright date.
2nd title The Van Beuren Corp,
copyright MCMXXXV (1935)

]]> By: 2oonhed http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/refrederator/2006/09/12/da-best-of-dafoe/#comment-390 2oonhed Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000 http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/refrederator/2006/09/12/da-best-of-dafoe/#comment-390 It was a Van Beuren production<br />distributed by Commonwealth. It was a Van Beuren production
distributed by Commonwealth.

]]> By: Keith http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/refrederator/2006/09/12/da-best-of-dafoe/#comment-388 Keith Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000 http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/refrederator/2006/09/12/da-best-of-dafoe/#comment-388 How does the blackface bit even make any sense as a joke?<br /><br />Also, am I hallucinating, or did the opening title mysteriously replace itself with one done in a drastically different style? How does the blackface bit even make any sense as a joke?

Also, am I hallucinating, or did the opening title mysteriously replace itself with one done in a drastically different style?

]]>