<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death Of Book Illustration</title>
	<link>http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/talk_to_the_snail/2006/08/22/the-death-of-book-illustration/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TeeDub</title>
		<link>http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/talk_to_the_snail/2006/08/22/the-death-of-book-illustration/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>TeeDub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/talk_to_the_snail/2006/08/22/the-death-of-book-illustration/#comment-313</guid>
		<description>What an interesting thought - I wonder what a modern-day Rackham would look like illustrating for a current thriller novel.&lt;br /&gt;I think we don't see book illustration (or, typically, any other illustration) like we used to because the internal imaging process has eaten its own tail.  From nothing, to hand-drawn illustrations which show style but leave specific, literal details up to the imagination of the reader, to photo-illustrations which show explicit-down-to-the-last-detail pictures of real people and tell us "this is what the character looks like" in order to establish the marketed property in concrete, back to nothing again.  I imagine publishers assume that we already have a photo in our heads of Tom Cruise or Harrison Ford to plug in to the main character role and that trying to engage the imagination differently would be simply irrelevant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Re-reading, I think I come off as being a little more bitter than I actually am.  Call it "bitter-sweet", I suppose.  Take a James Bond movie poster example.  When I compare the colorful, design-crazy imagery of smirking semi-cartoon characters bathing with a pile of hotties or flying mini-copters through impossible sky-scapes of exploding ordnance in the posters for You Only Live Twice (did any of this actually happen in the movie the way it's represented?) to the homogenized steel-blue photo collages of the later Brosnan movies, it definitely makes me yearn for the '60's (even though I was born in the '70's).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking of "born in the '70's", how crazy would a really stylishly-illustrated V.C. Andrews book be?  That could get really freaky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an interesting thought - I wonder what a modern-day Rackham would look like illustrating for a current thriller novel.<br />I think we don&#8217;t see book illustration (or, typically, any other illustration) like we used to because the internal imaging process has eaten its own tail.  From nothing, to hand-drawn illustrations which show style but leave specific, literal details up to the imagination of the reader, to photo-illustrations which show explicit-down-to-the-last-detail pictures of real people and tell us &#8220;this is what the character looks like&#8221; in order to establish the marketed property in concrete, back to nothing again.  I imagine publishers assume that we already have a photo in our heads of Tom Cruise or Harrison Ford to plug in to the main character role and that trying to engage the imagination differently would be simply irrelevant.</p>
<p>Re-reading, I think I come off as being a little more bitter than I actually am.  Call it &#8220;bitter-sweet&#8221;, I suppose.  Take a James Bond movie poster example.  When I compare the colorful, design-crazy imagery of smirking semi-cartoon characters bathing with a pile of hotties or flying mini-copters through impossible sky-scapes of exploding ordnance in the posters for You Only Live Twice (did any of this actually happen in the movie the way it&#8217;s represented?) to the homogenized steel-blue photo collages of the later Brosnan movies, it definitely makes me yearn for the &#8217;60&#8217;s (even though I was born in the &#8217;70&#8217;s).</p>
<p>Speaking of &#8220;born in the &#8217;70&#8217;s&#8221;, how crazy would a really stylishly-illustrated V.C. Andrews book be?  That could get really freaky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Seibert</title>
		<link>http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/talk_to_the_snail/2006/08/22/the-death-of-book-illustration/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Seibert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://archives.frederatorblogs.com/talk_to_the_snail/2006/08/22/the-death-of-book-illustration/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>There was a guy who ran Ted Turner's 'Turner Publishing' who agreed with you Eric. He released a few books with illos, but mostly, like everything else at that company, it didn't do too well. I think it'll take someone doing an everyday edition of Lord of the Rings or something to maybe kick start a new trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a guy who ran Ted Turner&#8217;s &#8216;Turner Publishing&#8217; who agreed with you Eric. He released a few books with illos, but mostly, like everything else at that company, it didn&#8217;t do too well. I think it&#8217;ll take someone doing an everyday edition of Lord of the Rings or something to maybe kick start a new trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

